General Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 9 years ago,
Is this too good to be true?
I found a vacant lot in west Tennessee for a screaming deal (I believe). It's almost free it's so cheap. The lot is fairly small and the previous owner was in the real estate game for a while and this is some of the last stuff he is tired of dealing with. There was a small house on the lot at one time but the renters were cooking meth so after much fighting with the courts they ended up tearing down the house. The owner would take care of any back taxes owed after a lawyer did a title search and what not if they found any issues he said he would pay them. There are no utility leins because when they tore down the house they cut the lines at the road so it would have to be reran if built on. End goal would be just flip the lot or put a mobile home on it and seller finance it and collect lot rent. It's zoned residential so according to the county I believe I can put one there.
Where I'm confused is that the tax assessor web site lists the lot as "deed acreage:0, calculated acreage:0, land units:1
The home is listed on the assessor website as in a subdivision so I'm thinking that might be why?
Is this too good to be true or should I pounce?