Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

737
Posts
620
Votes
Logan M.
  • Investor
  • Provo, UT
620
Votes |
737
Posts

Communism and Capitilism

Logan M.
  • Investor
  • Provo, UT
Posted

Yesterday, I posted about how we can solve affordable housing in America.

I had over 80 responses and the conversation got very political, which was not entirely a surprise.

My question though is what economic model is better for affordable housing?

China for example is supposed to have enough apartments for the entire population and housing is becoming more and more affordable while that bubble bursts. 

In America, we own our real estate and have turned housing into an asset we invest in and make money on rents as well. I am not saying China doesn't as well but my point is that we have a major housing shortage and we don't have a free market that says build build build until supply and demand converge.

So when it comes to housing which approach is best?

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
4,153
Votes |
4,205
Posts
Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
Replied
Quote from @Logan M.:

Yesterday, I posted about how we can solve affordable housing in America.

I had over 80 responses and the conversation got very political, which was not entirely a surprise.

My question though is what economic model is better for affordable housing?

China for example is supposed to have enough apartments for the entire population and housing is becoming more and more affordable while that bubble bursts. 

In America, we own our real estate and have turned housing into an asset we invest in and make money on rents as well. I am not saying China doesn't as well but my point is that we have a major housing shortage and we don't have a free market that says build build build until supply and demand converge.

So when it comes to housing which approach is best?

Affordable housing doesn't adequately describe what you want. I was in Moscow just after the fall of communism. Everybody that wanted a place to stay had one. The buildings were crumbling, elevators didn't work so we had to climb the stairs and the one I stayed in was for the elite scientists and engineers who were treated better than the average folks. The balconies were about to fall off the side of the building.

The joke was, "we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us". Housing was free so it didn't eat in the couple of hundreds dollars a month they were paid.

The nuclear physicist who guided us through the Kremlin said he made more money giving tours than being a rocket scientist. But, everybody has affordable housing.
 

Loading replies...