Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

737
Posts
619
Votes
Logan M.
  • Investor
  • Provo, UT
619
Votes |
737
Posts

Communism and Capitilism

Logan M.
  • Investor
  • Provo, UT
Posted

Yesterday, I posted about how we can solve affordable housing in America.

I had over 80 responses and the conversation got very political, which was not entirely a surprise.

My question though is what economic model is better for affordable housing?

China for example is supposed to have enough apartments for the entire population and housing is becoming more and more affordable while that bubble bursts. 

In America, we own our real estate and have turned housing into an asset we invest in and make money on rents as well. I am not saying China doesn't as well but my point is that we have a major housing shortage and we don't have a free market that says build build build until supply and demand converge.

So when it comes to housing which approach is best?

  • Logan M.
  • Most Popular Reply

    Account Closed
    • Investor
    • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
    4,152
    Votes |
    4,205
    Posts
    Account Closed
    • Investor
    • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
    Replied
    Quote from @Logan M.:

    Yesterday, I posted about how we can solve affordable housing in America.

    I had over 80 responses and the conversation got very political, which was not entirely a surprise.

    My question though is what economic model is better for affordable housing?

    China for example is supposed to have enough apartments for the entire population and housing is becoming more and more affordable while that bubble bursts. 

    In America, we own our real estate and have turned housing into an asset we invest in and make money on rents as well. I am not saying China doesn't as well but my point is that we have a major housing shortage and we don't have a free market that says build build build until supply and demand converge.

    So when it comes to housing which approach is best?

    Affordable housing doesn't adequately describe what you want. I was in Moscow just after the fall of communism. Everybody that wanted a place to stay had one. The buildings were crumbling, elevators didn't work so we had to climb the stairs and the one I stayed in was for the elite scientists and engineers who were treated better than the average folks. The balconies were about to fall off the side of the building.

    The joke was, "we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us". Housing was free so it didn't eat in the couple of hundreds dollars a month they were paid.

    The nuclear physicist who guided us through the Kremlin said he made more money giving tours than being a rocket scientist. But, everybody has affordable housing.
     

    Loading replies...