Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
3
Votes
Logan Crowder
  • Realtor
  • Vancouver, British Columbia
3
Votes |
16
Posts

Spreadsheet Analysis Help

Logan Crowder
  • Realtor
  • Vancouver, British Columbia
Posted

Hello all. Hoping some folks can give their two cents on the spreadsheet I built out and advise on any errors. The specific section of concern is the 10-year holding period summary.

This example is demonstrating buying a condo in Downtown Vancouver in 2011 for short term rental, selling end of year 2015 and buying two more units with the sale proceeds to hold for a further 5 years. this is being compared with someone who bought the same unit in 2011 but held all the way to year end 2020 instead of selling to reposition their investment. The person who sold and bought two more properties has a higher ROI and IRR than the other investor who just held.

Spreadsheet Link Here

I am hoping to get some feedback on if there are errors in the formulas used. ROI total is sum of 10-year cashflows, principal pay down and appreciation over initial investment back in 2011. I've been heads down in these spreadsheets for this whole week so want to make sure not missing any obvious mistakes.

Feedback on this statement would help to and if it is correct:

"IRR and ROI are so different as ROI is acting as if the debt pay down and appreciation are being realized whereas IRR is factoring those two returns aren't actually realized until end of year 10."