Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 17 years ago,

User Stats

24
Posts
0
Votes
Andy M
0
Votes |
24
Posts

MLS question

Andy M
Posted

Hi,

I recently bought, as my first property, a 3-family building that I am converting to condos in Cambridge, MA. Everything was going well until I got the floor plans done by an architect. The measured total area of the building per the architect is 2560 sq. ft., whereas the MLS sheet listed 2952 sq ft! I could understand a discrepancy of 2-3%, but not 12%!

Obviously this seriously impacts my bottom line. The MLS sheet listed the sq ft. source as "per public record", so on Monday I'm going to go to town hall and look at that public record. Any other suggestions? Do I have a legal leg to stand on here?

Andy

Loading replies...