Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

109
Posts
47
Votes
Joshua Stewart
  • Specialist
  • Charlotte NC
47
Votes |
109
Posts

Do Sustainable ("Green") Features Matter to Developers?

Joshua Stewart
  • Specialist
  • Charlotte NC
Posted

I am curious for those who have done single family new construction whether or not you chose to invest in any sustainable design or construction strategies for your projects, or if you specifically chose not to. Why or why not? Does anyone have experience doing a LEED-certified home or development for their investment projects?

I know a lot of it is based on location and the requirements of your state or municipality.

Looking to understand some of the pros or cons from a developer perspective as to why you chose or chose not to pursue this type of strategy, and what the benefits where either way.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

840
Posts
899
Votes
Nik Moushon
  • Architect
  • Wenatchee, WA
899
Votes |
840
Posts
Nik Moushon
  • Architect
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

This is a fun topic for me, since I'm an architect and this is a hot topic for discussions it gets brought up fairly often by clients. A couple things I'm going to clarify, more for everyones knowledge not that you necessarily got it wrong or dont know. 

Building Green and building LEED cert. buildings (any type) are two different things as well as building to LEED standards is different from either of those. All three of those are different from each other but all try to achieve the same end goal. 

We will start with the term "Green". This standard or type really has not solid definition to it. You could ask a dozen different professionals and they would all give you a different answer and mostly it is based on opinion. But the end goal is basically to be as sustainable and eco friendly as possible, both in the building of the building and the materials its built from and the life span of the building. As you can probably tell its a very loose term and is thrown around A LOT to describe everything from houses to everyday products like shampoo and cars. So if all you are looking for is a product sales pitch this is the definition you want to set you builds too. BUT this also leaves it up to interpretation by the buyers as to if its really "Green" or even "Green enough". 

Next is LEED certification for buildings. This applies to all buildings but residential and commercial building have different standards. There are different "levels" of LEED; Bronze, Silver, Gold & Platinum. Each will have more and more requirements to be met and get substantially hard to achieve as you go higher. There is also a lot of documentations that needs to be done for pretty much EVERYTHING. With a requirement that all this documentation be reviewed by a third party, adding to the costs of the project. All of which needs to be started at the very beginning of the project, including initial designs. This is a HUGE under taking and should not be taken lightly. Not that its not worth it the end. Its end goal is similar to that of being "Green" but its actually put to a very long list of things with very specific requirements. 

Then there is building to LEED standards. Basically its the same as LEEF cert but you actually dont get the building officially certified by LEED. That means not 3rd party review and you get to choose how closely you follow the LEED criteria for each level. You can follow it to a "T" or do a couple req. from Bronze and a couple from Gold. This is similar to saying your building is "Green" but you just have an actual standard you compare yourself too. Be careful here though because you could cross into false advertising if you don't say things correctly. Claiming your building LEED cert, when its not, is illegal since LEED is an actual entity. 

So as for whether you should build SFH to any one of these three is purely up to you. Whether you will appeal to more buyers really depends on your market. If your market is a much of millennial's looking to buy houses next to a bunch of tech company head quarters or big branch offices, then ya it might be worth it, heck you might even get to charge more. But if you are out in the middle of the mid-west with blue-collar workers, I seriously doubt it would be worth it. With that said you can easily build in more "green" materials or equipment and call your house "Green". Setting a standard for yourself, whether it costs more or less or break even, is something you have to decide. Again though, your market is going to be the determining factor here, and probably even more of a micro-market even.

Loading replies...