Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
0
Votes
Nicole F.
0
Votes |
9
Posts

Distributions - does this OA match the summary?

Nicole F.
Posted

Hi, newbie to syndication investments here. Would really appreciate some technical help with interpreting the OA language around distributions. It seems that the below verbiage allows the sponsor to participate in the preferred return, but the table in the deal summary on crowdstreet indicates they do not participate in the pref.

"Cash flow from operations in the ordinary course of the Property will ultimately be distributed
to Members in the following order:
-First, to all Members, until they receive an 8% Annual Non-Compounding Preferred Rate of
Return on all unreturned capital.
...

-Second, to all members pro rata in accordance with their respective interest (60% to investor
members and 40% to the Sponsor)." 

This last sentence seems to lump "investor members" and "Sponsor" together under the umbrella of "all members", so that would mean since all Members participate in the pref, Sponsors get to participate. However, Member is capitalized in the first sentence and not the last, so that may be meaningful.

The table in the offering shows no sponsor participation in the pref:

Please help, and thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,285
Posts
6,908
Votes
Brian Burke
#1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Santa Rosa, CA
6,908
Votes |
2,285
Posts
Brian Burke
#1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Santa Rosa, CA
Replied

Yeah, @Greg Dickerson is right.  The very definition of a preferred return is that a stream of cash flow is distributed entirely to the investors until the hurdle is met. If the sponsor is participating, it’s not a preferred return.  The language you supplied addresses that where it says “First...”

If the sponsor is investing cash in the deal alongside the investor, they would participate in this tier on a pro-rata basis, however.

The provision beginning with “Second...” addresses what happens to any remaining distributable cash after the first tier has been satisfied.

The only confusing thing to note here is that “members” is not capitalized in the second provision.  Any capitalized term should have a definition elsewhere in the agreement. It is capitalized in the first provision so you should find a definition somewhere (usually alphabetically in the beginning of the agreement).  The uncapitalized instance might be an oversight.

Loading replies...