Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

679
Posts
463
Votes
Dan Handford
  • Multifamily Syndicator/Investor
  • Columbia, SC
463
Votes |
679
Posts

Self-Management vs 3rd Party Management for Apartment Investing

Dan Handford
  • Multifamily Syndicator/Investor
  • Columbia, SC
Posted

Multifamily Investing Opinion:

Self-Management vs 3rd Party Management?

Most operators look to do 3rd party property management especially in the beginning stages as they begin to acquire more assets in a given market.

After many discussion with larger operators, including the larger REITs, it seems that their investors prefer the self-management option.

The consensus is that self-management is definitely not done to increase profit but to have better control over their assets.

Which do you prefer and why?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,285
Posts
6,908
Votes
Brian Burke
#1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Santa Rosa, CA
6,908
Votes |
2,285
Posts
Brian Burke
#1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Santa Rosa, CA
Replied

I preferred third-party management because the property management business is monumentally difficult.  In my mind there are few businesses that are more challenging than property management.

But as your business grows eventually you have to grow up from being a real estate wheeler-dealer into a full-blown operator.  This means taking property management in-house.  By that I don't mean a sole-operator syndicator sits in the office and tours prospects, signs leases, and knocks on doors collecting rent.  Instead, vertical integration means forming a management company and bringing in the right systems, technology, and teams to run it.  Think of it as third-party management but you own the company.  It's a professionally-run subsidiary, not an ad-hoc afterthought.

But up to a point vertical integration doesn't make sense because the management fee from just a few properties doesn't pay for the talent needed to oversee it.  For this reason, most people start out with third-party management--that's how I started too.  After I had 1,500 units and began seeking institutional investors, I knew it was time to make the move.

Institutional investors prefer groups that are vertically integrated because they realize that the operator has more control over the process, more integration, and a deeper commitment to being in the business for the long-haul.

So you're right, Dan.  It really isn't about profits, but control.  Having said that, control can lead to profits.  But this comes at a cost--it is a complex additional layer to execute so it's important to recruit excellent talent instead of trying to figure it out on your own.

Loading replies...