Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago,

User Stats

13
Posts
0
Votes
Mitch Kenney
  • Denver, CO
0
Votes |
13
Posts

1st property from 188 miles away

Mitch Kenney
  • Denver, CO
Posted

Hello everyone!

I looked in the message boards for my answer but could not find it. My wife and I live in the bay area and are looking to buy our first apartment building (appx 8 units) in fresno. Fresno is 188 miles from us so we would need a property management company.

Does anyone feel that on this small of a building that the property management fees would eat too much into our cashflow and it would make more sense to buy something closer so we can manage it ourselves? On our first property and it being rather small does anybody feel we should manage it ourselves? We have thought about moving back to Denver to invest where it may be more feasible.

Loading replies...