Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

13
Posts
2
Votes
Cory Asrilant
  • Investor
  • Valencia, CA
2
Votes |
13
Posts

Advice on an old elevator

Cory Asrilant
  • Investor
  • Valencia, CA
Posted

I'm in escrow to purchase my first office building.  It has great cash flow and in amazing shape except one thing.  The elevator is 39 years old.  Typically they last 20-25 years.  The seller is not willing to modernize it.  It would be entirely up to me and I don't have the funds (80K-ish) to do it for at least 5 years or more.  The cash flow on the property is good, but having a major upgrade like that would be tough.  The elevator has been well maintained and is currently working.  Would you buy a 39 year old elevator or would you pass?  I would lose my 1031, but not that much of a big deal.  Thoughts?

Thanks

Loading replies...