Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

127
Posts
10
Votes
Matt Liu
  • Jersey City, NJ
10
Votes |
127
Posts

Partnering with a Mortgage Broker and Environmental Attorney

Matt Liu
  • Jersey City, NJ
Posted

I am partnering with a Commercial Mortgage Broker and  Environmental Attorney on a big real estate deal (a warehouse conversion). The mortgage broker and environmental attorney are saying they want 33% equity each. Granted they are each doing a lot initially - the attorney is clearing the brownfield hoops and even suing the liable party, while the mortgage broker is arranging very good 100% financing, working with the city to setup the bridge loans/grants. 

The question is, is this really a fair split? A friend and I are splitting the remaining 33% doing EVERYTHING ELSE - the rehab, the contracting, the tenants, (the management too but probably at a cost to the operating account pre-owner-draw). 

In other words, is it common for an asset manager side of an investment team to make only 33% while the legal and capital side of the investment team make up the other 66% of the ownership?

Thanks!

Loading replies...