Commercial Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply
Partnering with a Mortgage Broker and Environmental Attorney
I am partnering with a Commercial Mortgage Broker and Environmental Attorney on a big real estate deal (a warehouse conversion). The mortgage broker and environmental attorney are saying they want 33% equity each. Granted they are each doing a lot initially - the attorney is clearing the brownfield hoops and even suing the liable party, while the mortgage broker is arranging very good 100% financing, working with the city to setup the bridge loans/grants.
The question is, is this really a fair split? A friend and I are splitting the remaining 33% doing EVERYTHING ELSE - the rehab, the contracting, the tenants, (the management too but probably at a cost to the operating account pre-owner-draw).
In other words, is it common for an asset manager side of an investment team to make only 33% while the legal and capital side of the investment team make up the other 66% of the ownership?
Thanks!