Commercial Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7cb3/e7cb37879f9e4fe5c018495bfca9876ec1384a96" alt="Eric M.'s profile image"
Question about Mortgage Docs and Recording for Comm Mortgages
This might seem esoteric but it has to do with an important investment I have made and I wanted to see if someone could answer my question.
I am in Chicago but I am not sure if this is a local thing or not.
I am unsure about what the actual loan amount was for a Commercial Mortgage I am researching on-line in the Cook County Recorders Office.
When I look up the database, it shows for example the loan is for $780,000. However when I look at the actual Mortgage Document, the cover page says the loan is for $390,000 but then in the first clause Titled Maximum Lien. It says the Maximum Principal Lien is 780,000.
So I thought that was odd so I looked at other mortgage documents from the same lender (a local mainstream bank). In about 60% of case the Max Lien shown was exactly double the Loan amount shown but in the other 40% the Maximum Lien was the same as the Loan Amount. This is for similar commercial properties and the same lender, same jurisdiction.
I am looking for the explanation. Could it be some difference in the repayment method (IO vs something else)? I don't have access to the Note documentation.
Any ideas? I am just trying to make sure that there were not 2 $390,000 checks issued and I am being misled.
Thanks