Best KPIs to Identify Financially Underperforming Properties in Portfolio

Best KPIs to Identify Financially Underperforming Properties in Portfolio

Investor · Member since 2018 · 259 posts · 74 votes

Hello! 

So I finally finished our property wide portfolio analysis. Here's an example of the 2022 KPIs I'm measuring for a few of the properties in the portfolio. 

A couple important notes on calculations and definitions: 

• Equity is defined as the FMV estimate less the loan balance (if there is a loan). FMV estimates use market knowledge and appraisal estimates when available.
• Cap Rate is the 2022 NOI divided by the FMV estimate. I actually used this number to adjust the FMV estimate where needed, if I saw a cap rate that was obviously too high or low for the market.
• Return on Capital. This is the 2022 Cash Flow (CF) divided by the total capital (cash) invested in the deal, included original down payment, closing costs, capex, etc. In year 1, this would be the cash on cash.
• Return on Equity. This is the 2022 CF divided by the total Equity in the property as defined above. 
• Return on Asset. This is the 2022 CF divided by the FMV for the property as defined above. 
• Profit Margin. This is the 2022 NOI divided by the 2022 Income for the property. 
• Expense Ratio. This is the 2022 Operating Expenses divided by the 2022 Income. 
• Leverage Ratio. This is the loan balance as of 2022 divided by the FMV as defined above. 

Also it is important to note that it should be assumed for this discussion that these properties are operating at peak performance, i.e. all value add has already been implemented. We're talking about financial performance here.

Question: How do you decide which properties are underperforming financially?

1. At first I thought the only metric I really needed to pay attention to was the Return on Equity (ROE). After all, this is telling me the current return on my cash invested. But then I realized a few problems with this... 

2. First, the definition of "Return" in this case means Cash Flow. Cash Flow is after things like Tenant Improvements, CapEx, and Leasing Commissions. So if the property got a new roof or had a major new tenant lease in the given year, this could wildly reduce your ROE. I mean, if it got a new roof, it certainly didn't perform well that year from a cash flow perspective, so it is a good metric, but not the full picture if you're analyzing for a buy/sell decision.

This can be fixed by looking at the NOI instead of the cash flow, which excludes the non-operating expenses listed above. This is the Cap Rate KPI, by definition.

However, a low Cap Rate isn't necessarily only because NOI is low. It's also a function of the market. Markets that command higher prices will have lower cap rates. So does a low Cap Rate necessarily mean you should sell?

3. The next problem with Return on Equity is that it's ignoring the option of adding debt to debt-free properties (for example, Properties C & E above) or refinancing others. Return on Equity may increase by adding leverage to a debt-free property. This brings us to the Return on Asset metric which removes the debt factor across the board and compares return of all properties based only to their FMV.

So the question here is how do we combine these metrics of Return on Equity, Cap Rate, and Return on Asset to make a uniform consensus on the financial performance of a given property compared to others? 

And what other financial metrics should be taken into consideration that we might be missing? 

1Reply
29 views

4 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Member since 2018 · 259 posts · 74 votes
    3y

    Ok, so here's an attempt to answer my own question. 

    First, a correction. Cap Rate is defined as NOI/FMV, not NOI/Equity which might have been unclear from sloppy writing above. Also I said Return on Asset removes all debt service, which is total garbage if you define Return as Cash Flow after debt service. Sorry. Thinking as I go here.

    Second, I still think the "Return" on Equity in ROE should be defined (NOI-Debt Service)/Equity instead of Cash Flow/Equity since Cash Flow includes all one-time expenses such as lease commissions and capital expenditures. I wrote about this issue here: https://www.biggerpockets.com/...

    Anyways, here's the solution I've come up with so far: 

    1. First, you need to derive the FMV of a property using price per foot or other metrics that do NOT include the cap rate.

    2. Once you've set your FMV, now you look at the RESULTING cap rate and compare it to market cap rates. If the cap rate of your property is low, that means you have an underperforming property in terms of NOI. In other words, you have an operational problem.

    If you can increase the NOI, great. Continue to the next step below.

    If you can't increase the NOI, consider selling by evaluating the returns you could get from a new property. There's no amount of debt or other financial instruments (e.g. LOC) that you can "add" to this property to make it competitive with a performing property (i.e. one that has a market NOI).

    3. The next step is to move on to Return on Equity. We define ROE := (NOI-Debt Service)/Equity to remove one-time expenses like capex and leasing commissions.

    We already checked that the Cap Rate was market. If the ROE is low, this gives two possible cases.

    Case 1: We add some sort of leverage to the property. This could be debt or a LOC for example. If this improves the ROE, then this property is a potential keeper.

    In this case, we would assume that the equity pulled out would be invested in a new property. So the total return of this case is the return of the original property (now with leverage) and the return of the new property.  

    Case 2: If the ROE does not improve with the leverage, then we should evaluate selling the property and purchasing a new property to see if we can improve the returns. 

    That's all I've got. I'm probably missing something huge. Welcome feedback. 

  • Henry ClarkPro Member
    Developer · Member since 2020 · 4k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    3y

    As long as you and your team understand the metrics you’re fine.  If you’re talking with external investors and lenders then I would make sure to conform to industry or business standards.

    Most external groups will have templates of their own which calculate their metrics based on the underlying data.

    Just looking at the sample data you provided your team has enough info to move forward with an analysis.  Which don’t fit operationally or take the most resources?  Assuming all are stabilized.  Which need to be harvested.  Think C had zero debt but low return on capital as an example.  Geographical.  Etc. 

  • Contractor · Nashville, TN · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    3y

    I'm currently trying to figure out if it's worth selling some rentals, and what should be my target ROI in replacement properties. ROE has been my primary metric. I understand that this is calculated as

    profit / (FMV - loan balance)

    In other words, how much profit it generates compared to the equity in the property from appreciation. In my mind, ROE can be compared to CoC ROI in a would-be replacement property. if your ROE is 5%, and you can get a 10% COC return with a 20% down payment on another property, you've doubled how hard your money/equity is working for you.

    All that is simple enough. What I'm trying to decide is if it's worth it to trade up for a 6% CoC. or 7. 10 would be worth it for sure I'd say.
    @kim 

    @Kim Hopkinsundefined

  • Investor · Member since 2018 · 259 posts · 74 votes
    3y
    Quote from @Allan Smith:

    I'm currently trying to figure out if it's worth selling some rentals, and what should be my target ROI in replacement properties. ROE has been my primary metric. I understand that this is calculated as

    profit / (FMV - loan balance)

    In other words, how much profit it generates compared to the equity in the property from appreciation. In my mind, ROE can be compared to CoC ROI in a would-be replacement property. if your ROE is 5%, and you can get a 10% COC return with a 20% down payment on another property, you've doubled how hard your money/equity is working for you.

    All that is simple enough. What I'm trying to decide is if it's worth it to trade up for a 6% CoC. or 7. 10 would be worth it for sure I'd say.
    @kim 

    @Kim Hopkinsundefined

     @Allan Smith Hi, sorry for the delay. I'm back to this project now and still stuck! 

    You said you were calculating ROE as: 

    Profit / (FMV - Loan Balance).

    Agree with the denominator. It's the numerator I'm questioning. 

    Do you define Profit as: 

    Profit := NOI - One-Time-Expenses (Capex, Lease Commissions etc) - Debt Service?

    If you're comparing ROE of an existing asset to COC of a new asset, then Profit should definitely be after debt service, since that's accounted for in the definition of COC.

    But for one-time expenses, if you are only looking at the ROE of an existing asset for one year (say the prior year) and you put on a new roof, you don't want to conclude the property has a terrible ROE from this one time expense. 

    That's why I'm saying "Profit" in ROE should be defined as: 

    Profit := NOI - Debt Service.

    But this definition doesn't exist anywhere. So...still confused.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.