Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4,456
Posts
4,295
Votes
Ben Leybovich
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix/Lima, Arizona/OH
4,295
Votes |
4,456
Posts

Lowering Expenses Is Not an Efficient Value Add Strategy

Ben Leybovich
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix/Lima, Arizona/OH
Posted

Say you’ve bought a 24-unit apartment building that generates $24,000/month in revenue ($1,000 per unit). This is a value-add, and you think you can improve the rents from $1,000 to $1,400, which would equal to revenue to $33,600/month.

Currently, the expenses are $10,000/month. This is pretty good at 42% of GOI, but you feel that you can cut expenses to $8,000/month.

You operate in a 5 cap market.

Let us analyze these numbers

Cutting expenses by $2,000/month, which would add $24,000 to the annual NOI, would capitalize to a value of $480,000 at 5 cap. This is great, but...

Question - how much would you need to raise rents to capture the same Delta?

Well, we already know that you'd need to add $2,000 per month ($24,000 per year) to the NOI. Divided among 24 units in your building over the course of a year, you'd have to raise revenue by $84 per unit.

Question - do you think it’s harder to cut expenses by $2,000 per month or to raise rents by $84?

Next, your underwriting tells you that you should be able to raise rents by $400, not $84. Therefore, by focusing on the value add you could create $2.3M of value, not $480,000. And even if your value-add does only 50% of the expected $400, you would still outperform cutting expenses...by a lot.

Question - which should you be focusing on, cutting expenses or value add?

The perspective 

It is extremely difficult to cut expenses without jeopardizing the asset. Naturally we don’t want to overspend unnecessarily. But, it has become fashionable to talk about cutting costs as a means to value-add. Let’s have trash pick-up twice per week instead of three times. Let’s pay less payroll. Let’s use a cheaper landscaping service. Etc.

Of course, we may use energy efficient fixtures or low-flow toilets. Those are easy, and they actually improve the property and make it more attractive to tenants and buyers. But, skimping on personnel or services may look good for a few months but will catch up to us before too long.

Cutting expenses is the cherry on the value-add cake, not the bread and butter of it. The real value is always, always, and always in the revenue.

Hope this helps some of you.

Loading replies...