Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
2
Votes
Jessamyn Smith
2
Votes |
9
Posts

Direct mail questions

Jessamyn Smith
Posted

I analyze small multifamily homes (my preferred property type) that are listed for sale and that I receive from a realtor.  The few that cash flow acceptably are usually already contingent and get snatched up immediately.  So I'm looking into direct mail.  I started finding properties that are not for sale, and I want to mail the owners, but my question is this:  is it more efficient to analyze each one and then mail out; or mail, and then in the few cases where I receive a reply, analyze and find a deal with it that cash flows?  I'm leaning toward the latter but then you're out more mailing costs even for properties that might be highly unlikely to cash flow regardless of how you structure the deal.

Then, ANOTHER question:  I understand one benefit of this method is avoiding realtor costs.  But say I wanted to use a realtor still because I have never once bought any house, and am not super confident with the process.  Does this defeat the purpose?  I would think no because there are still other benefits for me, but was curious about your thoughts on it.  I understand it's one less negotiation point I'll have with the potential seller.  

Thanks for your ideas.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

18
Posts
8
Votes
Erin Johnson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • La Crescent, MN
8
Votes |
18
Posts
Erin Johnson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • La Crescent, MN
Replied

Deciding which properties to direct mail would depend on how big of a pool you are targeting.  If you send out 100 without pre-analyzing you are spending $55.  You would hopefully then analyze a few to a handful of potential deals.  If you decided to pre-analyze you would have to experience of analyzing 100 deals and maybe mail out say 10 letters at $5.50 expense, but you may not get a bite on any of those 10.  So a question to you would be do you have the time and want the practice of analyzing deals or do you want to spend the money to send out more lines and hope to catch a few to analyze at that time? 

As far as using a Realtor, I am biased as I am an agent and feel we provide a wealth of knowledge and are particularly valuable to most home buyers and newer investors.  Once you get a few transactions closed maybe you would feel confident moving forward without one.  You can use a real estate attorney but they don't have the same fiduciary duties to you that a realtor would.

Have you reached out to an agent in your area? Maybe they could work with you in creating a direct mailing list where they could reduce their commission for your purchase with the benefit of potential listings that don't meet your criteria for a good deal?

Just some thoughts to chew on!

Loading replies...