Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes
NA Ken
  • New to Real Estate
2
Votes |
8
Posts

Investment Property loan

NA Ken
  • New to Real Estate
Posted

I was denied a loan to purchase an investment property using quicken loans.  They said the property value must be greater than the loan amount, have a low income to debt ratio, and have enough reserves.

The property is worth 140,000, I have the 25% down payment, which is 35,000.  They calculated that the house must be worth 200,000 and have 25% as a down payment.  I don't understand what this means.  I've always thought that the lower the loan amount, the easier it is to qualify for a loan.

I think what they are doing is calculating the amount from a different point of view.  They are calculating it based on a property that I already own and want to finance it to pull equity out - the last part of the buy, rehab, refinance strategy. 

If I was using the brr strategy, it would make sense to only lend on a property that has a higher value than what I am financing it for.  

For example, if I paid 140,000 cash, rehabbed it, now it's worth 200,000.  Now I would qualify for the 140,000 financing with 35,000 down.  75% of 200,000 is 140,000.  So they are only going to finance 70% of the value of the property.

Is my assumption correct?  Or is the lender just tightening their lending standards?   Or is it both?  Or is it something else?

Loading replies...