Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes
NA Ken
  • New to Real Estate
2
Votes |
8
Posts

Investment Property loan

NA Ken
  • New to Real Estate
Posted

I was denied a loan to purchase an investment property using quicken loans.  They said the property value must be greater than the loan amount, have a low income to debt ratio, and have enough reserves.

The property is worth 140,000, I have the 25% down payment, which is 35,000.  They calculated that the house must be worth 200,000 and have 25% as a down payment.  I don't understand what this means.  I've always thought that the lower the loan amount, the easier it is to qualify for a loan.

I think what they are doing is calculating the amount from a different point of view.  They are calculating it based on a property that I already own and want to finance it to pull equity out - the last part of the buy, rehab, refinance strategy. 

If I was using the brr strategy, it would make sense to only lend on a property that has a higher value than what I am financing it for.  

For example, if I paid 140,000 cash, rehabbed it, now it's worth 200,000.  Now I would qualify for the 140,000 financing with 35,000 down.  75% of 200,000 is 140,000.  So they are only going to finance 70% of the value of the property.

Is my assumption correct?  Or is the lender just tightening their lending standards?   Or is it both?  Or is it something else?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,016
Posts
3,125
Votes
Corby Goade
  • Investor
  • Boise, ID
3,125
Votes |
3,016
Posts
Corby Goade
  • Investor
  • Boise, ID
Replied

It sounds like there is a misunderstanding, but there's a bigger problem here. Quicken and virtually all other online lenders are a complete waste of your time and energy. They might have slightly lower rates, but trust me, the "service" you get from them will be abysmal. They'll kill deals for you- just like what you are experiencing right now. It's especially bad for investments. You're likely getting advice right now via quicken from someone who has never bought a house and has had virtually no training in their job. 

Find a local lender- regional bank, credit union, mortgage broker who knows what they are doing and will be accountable to you- in a good way, they WANT to give you good service. Those lenders are everywhere. At quicken, that person who you are talking to gets paid in volume, not service. They just want to get to the next phone call. 

  • Corby Goade

Loading replies...