Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Ezra Meyal
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Simple JV house-flipping structure questions

Ezra Meyal
Posted

Hello BP - long-time reader and fan of the content here, first-time poster.

I am working with long-time family friends and buying flipping properties in North Carolina.  They are experienced rehabbers, but tend to rehab and hold.  They're looking for me to join as a capital provider to scale their operation and move into flipping.  I don't know a ton about rehabbing properties, but I'm good at business development and have a decent chunk of capital to deploy, so we think there's a natural fit for us to work together.

We've agreed to the below structure:

1. 50/50 hard dollar cash equity on all deal-related, renovation, holding, sales, etc. costs

2. We don't plan to use leverage

3. 60 / 40 profit split to my partners / myself respectively, since they'll be doing all the actual work

4. All costs tracked and authorized by both parties

We want to keep it as simple as possible, but know that things get more complicated with partners, legal docs, bank accounts, etc. We're envisioning starting an LLC (is this the right entity to use?), opening a bank account, funding said bank account 50/50 with $$$, and then issuing funds out of that bank account for the project costs. Then, once the property is sold, the account is funded with that $, both investors return their hard-dollar investment 50/50, and whatever is left over is split 60/40.

This sounds a lot simpler than is probably reality, so that's why I'm asking for your expertise.  I'm a pretty conservative person, so don't really just want to do a handshake deal without proper structuring and documentation, even though I know my partners well.  We also want to have everything set up before we start hunting for properties, so we don't miss out on a good deal because the documentation isn't buttoned up.

Questions: best way to do this? are the terms outlined above good for me, or should I ask for more (as the more or less "passive" partner)? what entity to use?  do I just call a lawyer and say "hey I'd like to have [insert type of agreement] drafted up, can you help"?  I really need to 3rd grade level explanation here.

Also, first post, apologies if it's not in the right forum!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

942
Posts
637
Votes
Adam Schneider
  • Lender
  • Raleigh, NC
637
Votes |
942
Posts
Adam Schneider
  • Lender
  • Raleigh, NC
Replied

@Ezra Meyal The way you described your plan makes sense. There are obviously some buy/sell, and what if scenarios to be proactively agreed to that are standard issues to consider and have on paper. But, in terms of a business decision and structure...your plan sounds reasonable. The beauty of partnerships for flips is that you can dissolve the LLC fairly quickly (within months) without complications that normal businesses have (value of assets, passive revenue flow).

  • Adam Schneider
  • Loading replies...