Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

155
Posts
159
Votes
Peter Stewart
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Indianapolis, IN
159
Votes |
155
Posts

HOA & Occupancy Restrictions Issue

Peter Stewart
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Indianapolis, IN
Posted

Have a situation and I'm curious if anyone has had a similar issue, and if so, wondering what the outcome was.

I own a 2br 980sq ft condo in Inglewood, CA that I am currently selling. I am under contract and the buyers are a family of 6 (husband, wife, 4 kids). Halfway through the transaction we found out that the CCR's restrict occupancy to 5 people (the 2+1 rule). Per the HOA management company, the HOA, and the HOA's legal counsel, the rules are the rules, and they cannot be changed (even if the board/homeowners vote...it could be overturned). Basically they said "too bad".

Initially both the buyers and I felt this was a clear fair housing violation (familial status). I've spoken to HUD (no help) as well as the code enforcement dept of Inglewood (who HUD told me to call, also no help). I have also been in touch with an RE attorney in LA as well as my agents legal counsel. I'm not really getting any solid answers. It seems like a big grey area, and one that would require an expensive and lengthy lawsuit to (attempt) to solve.

Of course the obvious answer is to cancel the contract and find a new buyer that doesn't have 4 kids. My issue is that we're under contract at a very good price, and a new buyer could mean tens of thousands of dollars less for me. Not to mention delays in closing. So, I'm highly motivated to find a way to make this work for my buyers.

Has anyone else run into a similar issue? If so, how did you resolve it?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,725
Votes
Replied

Under the circumstances I would think that what you want would be irrelevant. I would guess that your buyer would be a fool to go ahead with the purchase and has a legal right to terminate the agreement. Has his lawyer not informed you he wants to terminate the purchase. From the buyers perspective the obvious answer is clearly to cancel the contract.

From your perspective it would be a waste of time to try and save this deal. It would be on hold indefinably trying to reverse the HOA rules. Some battles simply are not worth fighting for any amount of money.

Time to move on.

Loading replies...