California Rent Control

[Jim Cummings]

California Draws Battle Lines in Rent Control Conflict

Kathy Fettke | 28 May 2018

The battle lines have been drawn in the war over California rent control. Tenant advocates announced recently they have enough signatures for a ballot initiative to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Act, which could open the floodgates for extreme rent control in California and put some landlords right out of business.

Why Rent Control Doesn’t Work

While the idea of rent control may sound like a nice one (help keep real estate affordable for families who otherwise would be forced to move), the concept is, by nature, easy to exploit. Tenants may hold onto low-rent apartments for years despite employment gains and higher salaries, crippling landlords’ ability to collect market rents for decades. This not only hurts the landlords, it also eliminates affordable housing for people who truly need it and creates a stagnant rental market.

Rent control also creates a losing situation for landlords in terms of operating income. If a landlord cannot generate enough money to maintain properties, they will be forced to forego repairs and let buildings deteriorate. In California, that can lead to tenants being able to legally refuse to pay rent while being protected from eviction if a trigger maintenance issue arises. Landlords often tend to opt out of the rental game, sell their properties, and put their money elsewhere. If they sell to owner-occupants, which is likely, that removes those rentals from the market entirely and, again, reduces available housing for the renters who desperately need it.

We are on the Cusp of Massive Rent Control

If this ballot measure wins voter approval, investors with property in California are on the cusp of what could be a massive shift toward rent control. Cities that currently have rent control ordinances include Berkeley, Beverly Hills, East Palo Alto, Hayward, Los Angeles, Los Gatos, Mountain View, Oakland, Palm Springs, Richmond, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood. Notably, Thousand Oaks has rent control but is phasing it out.

Because a repeal of Costa-Hawkins will substantially broaden the legal alternatives for cities to implement rent control, California landlords currently operating under the protection of the act may need to rethink their investment plans if the measure is approved in November.

Investor Insight:If this ballot passes and you own California rental real estate, you may need to reevaluate your investment strategy.

[Brian Garlington]

Hmmm............so long term tenants here in the Bay Area want Rent Control.....AirBNB listings have dropped dramatically because The City of SF got greedy....in Richmond you literally have to pay for your tenant to move out if you no longer make your rental property a rental property.....

1. Y'all may not like this,...but that's why both my rentals here in the Bay Area are to Section 8 tenants that I personally screened.....Don't have to worry about some "entitled thinking person" saying, I'm not going to pay you rent this month.....Those checks come from the housing authority like clockwork the 1st of the month.....EVEN DURING THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

2. In Oakland, when a tenant's rent is subsidized by the government (As in Section 8!), you are not held to the same restrictions of rent control.

3. I also invest out of state in Cleveland......very general rule of thumb is if it's a republican state, it is more landlord friendly. I have a small portfolio (2 duplexes and 2 SFR's in Cleveland) out of state and all are at least the two percent rule. You will not find anything in the entire state of California meeting the 2% rule.

4. As previous posters have said.....VOTE in November and make sure we don't let this nonsense of a measure pass.