Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

89
Posts
12
Votes
Eli Kallison
  • Investor
  • Arcata, CA
12
Votes |
89
Posts

Funds vs. Buy and Hold

Eli Kallison
  • Investor
  • Arcata, CA
Posted

Hey BP,

After doing significant research and thinking through my goals (PASSIVE cash flow= primary, capital growth= secondary), I'm starting to think investing in funds & syndicated deals makes more sense than buying and holding property.  I have thought about notes, etc, but funds seem to be a great way to.

If you vet the funds and operators thoroughly enough, it seems like there is the potential for far fewer headaches and, a lot of time, better cash flow.

What are your thoughts on this? Do any of you guys invest almost solely through funds or other completely passive investments?

Loading replies...