Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

186
Posts
81
Votes
Shane W.
  • Professional
  • Santa Monica, CA
81
Votes |
186
Posts

Possibly changing tact

Shane W.
  • Professional
  • Santa Monica, CA
Posted

So my girlfriend and I are looking to buy our first investment property and because we live in Los Angeles we figured anything in our area would be out of our range (150k-200k). Therefore of course we have been looking out of state. The idea of having the property so far away and quite possibly not even seeing it in person is a bit daunting.

We're wondering what the positives and negatives would be of buying closer to home in SoCal vs buying out of state?

We're looking at SFR to buy and hold.

Loading replies...