Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Igor Nastaskin
  • Santa Maria, CA
1
Votes |
16
Posts

Keep or change real estate agent?

Igor Nastaskin
  • Santa Maria, CA
Posted

I am trying to decide if I should have my commercial real estate agent help me get the deal in a city 70 miles away or should I get a new local agent.

A little bit of background information. For past 1 month I am working with an agent looking for commercial real estate in Los Angeles. I found one property, he sent me another, that's pretty much it. We did not sign any agreements. Agent seems like a nice guy, not pushy. Through loopnet I found a commercial property in Palmdale (70 miles away). The deal is better than what I've seen so far in Los Angeles. So I was thinking if I end up buying this property, should I go though my current agent. Or find one in Palmdale? Thank you

Loading replies...