New to Real Estate · Bel Air, MD · Member since 2021 · 5 posts · 1 vote
All,
I understand that putting less down on a property allows for opportunity to purchase other properties but putting less down also raises the monthly mortgage payments and you would also have to pay PMI (depending on the lender). From what I have analyzed, these two increases in expense always makes the deal worse. I hear a lot on the podcast that being able to buy a property as your primary residence has the massive benefit of putting a lower down payment (i.e. 5% down), however, I do not understand why that is from an analytical standpoint. If anyone could help me with this knowledge gap, I would appreciate it. Thank you!
Let's say you have $200k to use. You plan to buy an $800k house to live in. You could use the entire $200k and put 25% down. Or you could put 3% down, $24,000 and still have $176,000 to use.
Or you could downgrade to say $600,000 and put 3% down instead to ease that monthly payment. In which case youd spend $18,000 and have $182,000 to invest.
That Would give you the buying power to buy up to $910,000 in investment properties.
The more you leverage, the more you can buy. That is neither a good thing or a bad thing, it is merely a fact. It is also comsumate with risk. The more you leverage the more risk you take on. Thus why the lender needs to mitigate their risk by charging you a higher rate and forcing you to purchase mortgage insurance to insure that risk.
There is opportunity cost with putting more cash into a property. Putting less may raise your monthly payments but the extra cash you save can make you more money in other properties.