Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

164
Posts
121
Votes
Ed Brancheau
  • Real Estate Coach
  • San Diego, CA
121
Votes |
164
Posts

Skip Trace Service Recommendations for Land

Ed Brancheau
  • Real Estate Coach
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I'm using Batchleads.io to skip trace houses but I'm not sure that it will work for raw land because raw land properties don't have a mailing address 75% of the time. All I have is the property owner's mailing address of the property owner but I wonder, if I'm skip tracing that mailing address, will I actually be tracing the owner of the land?

My guess is that the land owner probably also owns the mailing address property, because how many land owners are renters (I was because I was deeded some property but I'm probably in the minority), but I'm not certain.

So, any recommendations for skip tracing services that work well for land owners? Or a strategy that would work well?

Loading replies...