Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

737
Posts
619
Votes
Logan M.
  • Investor
  • Provo, UT
619
Votes |
737
Posts

Why I prefer Month to Month Leases

Logan M.
  • Investor
  • Provo, UT
Posted

I bought my first Mobile Home Park in 2018 and started to realize that every tenant was on a month-to-month lease. At first, I thought this could be a negative but I started realizing a few benefits.

1. Many tenants in MHPs don't care about keeping their credit up when life gets hard and are willing to break their lease regardless of length. You can't force someone to live somewhere or to pay if they just can't.

2. The flexibility to boot problem tenants far outweighs being held hostage by the bad ones.

3. It allows a lot of flexibility with future highest and best opportunities.

4. You can decide when to increase rents.

5. There is nothing cheaper to rent in my market so there are ten potential tenants for each space and because of this, the tenants would be happy being on a month-to-month lease for ten years than finding another place to live with a year lease.

I know some of these sound a little brutal but I would rather leave it up to me to make decisions than have my hands tied. 

  • Logan M.
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,946
    Posts
    2,150
    Votes
    Ned J.
    • Investor
    • Manteca, CA
    2,150
    Votes |
    1,946
    Posts
    Ned J.
    • Investor
    • Manteca, CA
    Replied

    I do MTM on my SFR properties from day 1. I did that based on the advice of a friend that does evictions.

    There is ZERO downside..... if people want to leave, they leave regardless of the lease terms..... and that warm fuzzy feeling of a long term lease is an illusion... you are not likely to see a dime of the remaining lease if they bail.

    On the flip I can get rid of them WAY faster at any time I decide.... I have way more power. Long term favors the tenant WAY more that the LL

  • Ned J.
  • Loading replies...