Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago, 05/29/2016

User Stats

8
Posts
0
Votes
Harry Mishkin
  • Newton Center, MA
0
Votes |
8
Posts

Should I use a buyer's agent?

Harry Mishkin
  • Newton Center, MA
Posted

I've bought homes for myself in the past, so I am not totally clueless.  I am just starting to actively look for my 1st 2-4 unit mf and have found a listing I'd like to pursue.  I know a buyer's agent whom I trust.  But are there advantages to dealing with the selling agent directly?  For example, would the fact that they do not have to split the commission make an agent more likely to encourage an owner to accept a lower offer than if a buyer's agent were involved?

Loading replies...