Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes
Brandon Dietz
  • New to Real Estate
  • St. Thomas, Ontario
2
Votes |
8
Posts

Newbie Alert! Tax Question / Analysis (FIRST POST Whoohoo!)

Brandon Dietz
  • New to Real Estate
  • St. Thomas, Ontario
Posted

Hi there, 

Thanks in advance for the read.

I am new to the real estate investing world and had a question / would love opinions on my current analysis!

This may be a stupid question so forgive my ignorance. 

Has anyone considered purchasing a property that just broke even from a cash flow perspective to assist in bringing your taxable income down.  

For example, I found a property in Ontario that I could see being a potential to get started and get my feet wet.  Not a home run, barely a base hit, and to be honest I would probably consider it a sac-fly. But at least it would get me started.  It is a legal triplex (1br, 2br, 3br) and I am trying to consider my options.  After analysis, it looks like the cashflow would be around -$41.63 a month for a 20 year mortgage but around $162.97 for a 25 year (I was thinking about trying to stick to the 20 year).  However, I also feel that my monthly expenses are a bit high, but I feel like it makes sense for the age of the property and its condition (Around $1,472).  So technically, if it can 'hold together' so to speak, it would be a pretty decent start. Seeing how I paid quite a bit in taxes last year, I have been considering this as my first "at bat", primarily because of the tax benefits. 

Listed Price $359,900

Planned purchase price $338,002 (98% of value minus estimated $15K reno cost)

20% Down $67,600.40

Mortgage term 20 years, 4.9% interest

Monthly Mortgage $1,769.63

Total Monthly Expenses $1,728 (Taxes/Vacancy/Insurance/Property Management/CapEx)

Percentage of renters in area 63%

Average Household Income $66,500 (30% of rent would be $1,662.50)

Total Planned Rental Cost (1br/2br/3br): $1,500/$1,600/$1,700 (still need to confirm what the current tenants are renting at, I know this could drastically change my cash flow figure)

Average Home Value: $270,000

Average Rental Comparisons in the area (1br/2br/3br): $1,510/$1,650/$1,750


2% Test = 0.95% (1.42% if room is rented)

Side note: This is also not including the fact that the 1 bedroom in the attic has been recently renovated and not currently rented, at this time I'm not trying to expect it to be rented right off the bat.

Let me know if you have any questions or want any clarification.  

Again I'm new so forgive me if I didn't explain thoroughly enough or in the right way. 

Cheers!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

687
Posts
369
Votes
Roy Cleeves
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Kitchener, Ontario
369
Votes |
687
Posts
Roy Cleeves
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Kitchener, Ontario
Replied

Hi Brandon.  Is this in St. Thomas?

If so rents may go up with the VW battery plant coming and creating 3000 new jobs.

It seems like a great way to get started.  You will still be making money because of the mortgage pay down each month and the appreciation in value over time.

It may not save you on your taxes as the income gets added to you unless you put it in a company name rather than you personally (which I would recommend).  You see, even though it is negative cashflow - you don't get to write off the principal pay down each month which is probably have of the monthly payment.  So in the end you are adding to your income rather than subtracting.  

If you set it up in a business name then you pay less taxes on it and you can write off many of your expenses that apply to your real estate investment business and that will help you personally.

Best wishes

Loading replies...