Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
4
Votes
Nicholas Mangiafico
  • Investor
  • Connecticut
4
Votes |
8
Posts

Vacant Duplex or Below Market Triplex

Nicholas Mangiafico
  • Investor
  • Connecticut
Posted

Hi all,

I have two properties I am looking at as my first investments. One is a completely vacant 2 family in a great location, where I can set the rents at market value as soon as possible. The other is a 3 family in a good, not great area, that is full and has each unit at below market rents, but once they are turned over (I do not know the leases they are on) it will have higher cashflow than the duplex. My realtor (who is an investor) and some other investor friends of mine said they would prefer the duplex so I figured I would ask on the forum. Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

59
Posts
53
Votes
Joseph Salzillo
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Connecticut
53
Votes |
59
Posts
Joseph Salzillo
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Connecticut
Replied
Quote from @Samuel Eddinger:

@Nicholas Mangiafico - as a Connecticut based investor I can tell you without fail that I love 3 and 4 families more than I love 2 families (I actually prefer SFR over two families).

Here's the reasons:  The incremental taxes from going from a 2 to a 3 or 4 is relatively small.  In general, the price per unit is higher for a 2 family than 3 or 4 family but the incremental rent is not that much (tenants still think of it as a multi family).  With a 2 family, you still have to pay for landscaping and snow plow services but now that cost is divided over 2 units instead of 3 or 4.

Two family houses will probably appreciate a bit faster than a 3 family because people priced out of the SFR market would prefer living with one additional family instead of bigger apartment complexes. This causes the purchase price to generally be more costly (less cash flow/CAP rate) since you are competing against people that want this property to be their "forever" home.

Happy to talk further if you would like to discuss.  DM me if interested.

 @Samuel Eddinger couldn't agree more. We only purchase 3/4 family properties in CT for this same exact reason; I wouldn't get a duplex unless if it were really discounted to the point where it could cashflow after vacancy / management / repairs / CAPEX. If you have one unit that needs to get evicted in a duplex, you're negative every month and at risk of losing the property.

On another note, some single family properties are great if you can flip them or turn them into a medium term rental if you can't get the sale price you want.

  • Joseph Salzillo
  • [email protected]
  • 860-637-1379
  • Loading replies...