Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

300
Posts
205
Votes
Nicholas Lohr
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
205
Votes |
300
Posts

Can someone tell me if this is accurate regarding LLC's please!

Nicholas Lohr
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

For my first deal I had to take title and mortgage in my own name as the bank would not lend to the LLC.

However I do keep all the property's income and expenses in and out of an LLC that I formed because someone told me that there is a difference between the "mortgage" and the "property" and that having the money flow in and out of an LLC would offer some kind of protection from my personal finances.  Is this true or untrue?

I just now asked a lawyer if my second property should be in its own individual LLC again even though the mortgage and title will again need to be in my name and he informed me that this would really be pointless as it's who is on title that counts and that there really wouldn't be any limited liability at all. Is this true or untrue?

  • Nicholas Lohr
  • Loading replies...