Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

717
Posts
50
Votes
Greg P.
  • Los Angeles, CA
50
Votes |
717
Posts

2% rule and 50% rule

Greg P.
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hello, I know this has been mentioned many times on these forums, but I am still a bit confused, and was wondering if someone could help run numbers on a couple of scenarios.

Scenario #1- House is vacant, potential rent is $1250 and I could buy it for $52k and then it needs 12k to rehab.

Scenario #2- 4 plex , one unit occupied at $500 per month and the rest can be rented out at $500 per month so potential $1500 gross rents. Purchase price is $50k and 30k worth of work.

How would you calculate both formulas to these scenarios.

Thank you very much.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,316
Posts
569
Votes
Nathan Emmert
  • Investor
  • San Ramon, CA
569
Votes |
1,316
Posts
Nathan Emmert
  • Investor
  • San Ramon, CA
Replied

So Greg, the 50% and 2% rules are used for analysis.

Essentially, the 50% rule says over the long term, a property managed rental will average 50% expenses. This is inclusive of all expenses short of your debt servicing. Your property taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, legal fees, repairs, advertising, etc etc etc.

The 2% rule is an evaluation tool. It steers you towards properties that generate a monthly rent of 2% of the purchase price. At a $500/unit rental point, the 2% rule is designed to generate $100/door which is a normal target for Landlords. Note as your rents move from $500, up or down, you may want to adjust that 2% rule.

So lets look at your deals. House 1 would be $53,250. 2% of that would be about $1,065. If your rents are accurate, looks like a solid deal. Lets look further. Lets assume you mortgage $48,000 (just over 75% LTV) @ 5% for 30 years, your payment would be $258/mo (mortgage + interest). So with rents of $1,250 and the 50% rule, you would have $625 for debt servicing and cash flow. With $215 for debt servicing, your projected monthly cash flow would be $367. That's very healthy.

Deal 2, I'm assuming you mean it would rent for $2,000 a month (4 units * $500/mo). At $80,000, you would be looking for $1,600 a month in rent. Again, looks pretty solid. Your mortgage payment ($60,000 @ 5% for 30 years) would be $322. With 50% towards expenses, your cash flow is projected at $678 a month, about $170/unit which is very solid.

So lets look at cash on cash. Assuming you get to 75% LTV on either property after repairs (and ignoring closing costs cause I'm lazy).

$367 * 12 / $16,000 = 27.5%
$678 * 12 / $20,000 = 40.7%

Both deals are good. A single family house will likely appreciate faster and be less overall management. The multifamily home will appreciate slower but generate better month to month cash flow and CoC returns.

Loading replies...