They all get thrown into the very same civil division and fight it out.

@Karen Rittenhouse I would go further and skip the attorneys and simply go to the state and pay for an opinion letter from them.. they have to give you one.. if they say fine then your good to go.I have been in front of regulators with my attorney saying we can beat them but at what cost if they want to nail you .. you can't fight them too expensive especially for the average investor who I doubt is going to spend 100k to fight in front of a law review judge.. been there done that .. cost me 30k LOL. so its from experience at least in our state.And in our state double close did not work either according to the investigator they take the position your still marketing a property you don't own.. that's the crux.

I'm not a lawyer or a judge, though.As others have said, probably not worth fighting it because the laws are still somewhat vague and have not been thoroughly scrutinized and fleshed out via court cases. 

In my opinion, it's important to have a balance between the two types of compensation.But back to the point: The best tool in the conservative investor toolbelt for fighting the "dirty secret" is skin in the game/cash from the sponsor.

Although housing is high, but you can buy home here, except you have to be smart to purchase home at the soft market... and not fighting with RE speculators during seller market.

The new owner of Lot A spent a lot of time and money fighting it.

It gets really awkward if you guys are fighting and they're late on rent lmfao.

I bought deals that the neighbors would of bought first if they would of known the house next to them was going cheap.How many more deals could you of bought while you spent three years fighting in court?

She said she would gladly pay the extra usage but how can I claim her usage without a fight. 

The fight is not whether it costs more than 50% to repair, that is fight I believe we will lose.