It depends on proximity to other areas....something I often see overlooked here when it comes to "bad" properties is whether not they can offset, mitigate or compliment a development.

For most people, they think this is a bad thing, but its actually not. 

I am a Realtor on Long Island who has a bad tenancy to spend more time looking at investments than marketing.

He has the property listed with a bad broker who hasn't done anything right by him, so I'd assume he can just delist the property, and sell the company instead, and could also save himself from paying 6% to someone who has done nothing but keep lowering the price for him in the year he has been trying to sell it.Would this mean there is no county-recorded sales transaction, since the entity which owns the property would remain XYZ?

Any info, bad or good, will be greatly appreciated.

It's all BS statements because the banks can essentially change the rate to whatever they want between terms, but it would be bad for business to be inconsistent.

I really like giving second chances and helping people get back on their feet (I hire ex cons in my other business with pretty good success) but I feel like there are so many bad things this could potentially bring on.

Have you ever had any experiences bad, good or worse with a local HOA?

Is that a bad rate of return for a relatively easy investment to maintain? 

Is it a bad venture?