Unless the property is being held for multiple periods, it appears it would be expensed.

I've talked to an attorney and it's $899 to get the judgement and another $250 for a court appearance.

@James ShelbyIt appears that you may not qualify for a solo 401k because your are not self-employed.

I've been following it since it first appeared.

and one was conventional with 20% down and the other was FHA I felt the conventional buyer was dragging their feet so I finally sent out notice to perform and cancellation of escrow that seemed to do the trick because paperwork that was never sent suddenly started appearing immediately It helps when you have a hefty deposit

We also painted the roof rim/facia and balconies to match (no shutters on this building).Another building in the area is going through this now and they appear to be going with a cement board or masonite cladding (I haven't gotten that close) in a brown/green earth tone.

I personally am not offended by it, and I'm a huge supporter of state's rights, but I want to make sure my properties are professional in appearance.

With that said, the mere appearance such a clause, unenforceable though it may be, would probably still have the desired effect.

I looked online and it appears that this is different from section 8.  

Based on the pics provided, it would appear so but that doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things.