It does not protect against non renewal of a lease or lease violations. 

If you are worried, look at the content she produces, if it would not violate any rules of the site, then you are good.Best Wishes!

I'm unable to post a link to the blog as it would violate BP posting rules but if you wanted to read it in its entirety, you can find more information in my profile.

Many people do that here but it's a risk if the city finds out you may face code violations and potentially having to demolish past work.

Unless you've done something to violate the contract, they can't fire you and demand payment.I would stick to your plan of demanding written notice, a smooth transition with the tenant, and no charges unless they are justified expenses you've agreed to and that were performed as required.I have nothing against filing complaints, but make sure they've actually violated the contract or the Code of Ethics.

They violated the lease agreement by terminating early. 

Each loan is priced separately and repeat borrowers get a little better pricing.StephanieThere is nothing about a Non-QM loan that allows a lender to violate the LO Compensation Rule or do things any differently with regards to margin and LO comp and that seems to be what you're suggesting. 

One day a Tenant decided to sue for a Fair Housing violation. 

No issue with him buying it as long as his intent is to live there at the time (I'm not an attorney, just my understanding), but if you have another legal document outlining an agreement that you are partially responsible for the mortgage, etc I'm pretty sure that would violate something he is signing in the loan paperwork, so if you ever went to court, I'm not sure how that would play out. 

The condo unit itself is fine and rent ready shape with no violation.