I'm sure you'll find more as explore and participate on the forums.

From experience, I've seen some slick wording about income splits that 'creeps' into splits on equity participation. 100% of sales price implicitly (and explicitly by OA if done right) means 100% of equity... unless someone is out to screw the lender.

Deal and pay for supplies and pay labor after closing for a little extra or offer a profit participation to the GC.I have done a few in Monmouth and Ocean counties and even one in the Poconos.

Most participants only wish that they had started their interest in the business at your age.

You will learn a lot, much of what you don't even know you need to learn, but your eyes will be open and your heart will be warm as you participate here.Welcome!

Thirty years ago men were 99% of the lawyers, now my old law school is just barely off of a 50% ratio.

Just wanted to thank everyone that participates on BP and provides their insights and experiences for us newbies to learn from.Doug

Good, #13 might be minimum loan, to a borrower a lender won't have much of a restriction on a maximum as they can begin getting affiliate or participating lenders, folks here won't hit a maximum, you can get stuck by the minimum.In lower cells, you might add:ARMSIndexMarginCap rate adjustmentFloor/ceilingBalloon:) 

I know many clients of my company are investing in multiple different opportunities and specifically within real estate many participate in syndications as well.

As to the JOBS Act and Title III, which is what I assume you are referring to, there need to be some changes that actually make it viable to small companies looking for small raises, to participate without being bogged down in legal fees.