After tenants moved they are objecting to the security cameras (doorbell and floodlight) even though I have given them shared access to the camera content and it was mentioned in the contract that the premises comes with cameras. is it legally allowed to use surveillance cameras What is the best course of action in your experience 

Yes, investments in Ontario are pricey, so idemtifying a region and the focusing on that region, also allows one to look at economics and market, objectively.

Well the whole objective of the Wholesaler is to make quick money.

If they object to providing it I tell them I may not be able to report on time payments and ask why they would object to that.Following that conversation I’ve never had anyone not provide it.

There are multiple scenarios to consider without more specific facts.I think so long as you apply objective criteria (e.g., first to apply, first to tender a deposit, etc.), then you are fulfilling your legal duty to not discriminate. 

My objective is long term cash flow.

You also don't want to tie up your DTI on a lot of 15 year mortgages and hold yourself hostage from future purchases.

Then the objective would be to find properties with good cash flow with no expectation of capital appreciation.

Originally I was told to require all tenants to obtain renter's insurance, but I have had prospective tenant's object to this idea because they are mostly college students who own few items of material value. 

Objective: Purchase a duplex in Los Angeles/Greater LA.