It might seem like that to you, but I don’t think there is any evidence of people actually having less stuff...

There was no evidence of breaking and entering.  

Then we totaled our car, and despite having email evidence that I authorized adding comprehensive coverage to the car because we kept having to dip into our EF for the house (which was riddled with issues - long story), the vehicle was not covered.

We have evidence of storm or wind damage on the roof according to the roofing company that quoted us.

I'm also suspect that there is any evidence that civilian guns stopped 1 - 2 million crimes.

I'm sorry, but you have no evidence whatsoever that a downturn has any relation just because you feel it's so.

Originally posted by @Kevin Phu: Straight from the text, "In the absence of evidence to the contrary, if the increased costs for household necessities or decreased earnings took place at any point between March 4, 2020, and March 4, 2021, then the court shall presume that the increased household costs or decreased household earnings was due to the COVID-19 virus."

The judge simply won't let you appear to get a judgment, so no matter what you do to evidence that they should be paying you, they're living there, and they aren't paying you, you won't get a signed judgment that evicts them.I would say even sending a 5-day letter is a mistake. 

So, they think that even with little detail and even less evidence, that 30k house in Cleveland or Memphis or any other city not in California, must be a good deal. 

So show me the evidence that a significant percentage of billionaires have created their wealth via public stock trades.