Twenty-four hours is presumed to be a reasonable notice in the absence of evidence to the contrary.(9) Promptly commence an action under Chapter 1923. of the Revised Code, after complying with division (C) of section 5321.17 of the Revised Code, to remove a tenant from particular residential premises, if the tenant fails to vacate the premises within three days after the giving of the notice required by that division and if the landlord has actual knowledge of or has reasonable cause to believe that the tenant, any person in the tenant's household, or any person on the premises with the consent of the tenant previously has or presently is engaged in a violation as described in division (A)(6)(a)(i) of section 1923.02 of the Revised Code, whether or not the tenant or other person has been charged with, has pleaded guilty to or been convicted of, or has been determined to be a delinquent child for an act that, if committed by an adult, would be a violation as described in that division.

I don't see any evidence that they have isolated "vacant" properties...P.S.

Remember, anyone can sue anyone for anything, so the existence of a lawsuit doesn't really provide much evidence.

Anecdotal evidence aside, could you refresh us as to:Your estimate of current value?

Then set up a security camera, and if they come back and break in, have them arrested for B&E, theft, DOP, etc.This assumes they have no evidence that they have any legal right to be there.

:) Bill Gulley, it's difficult to not take this as an attack, but I'm going to assume you aren't automatically calling me greedy.It's evident that you look at all hard money lending from the perspective of residential lending, based on credit scores, and consider hard money loans to be predatory.However, in my experience and within my network, all such loans are1.

Even when there is irrefutable evidence to the contrary...People are either too fearful or too lazy to think for themselves (even when the facts can't be missed); and to avoid having to think, they are willing to entrust their livelihood to others. 

How Negative Coverage Can Hurt Your BusinessNegative coverage can lead to a negative image among:--Lenders, who could be less willing to approve financing to investors;--Passive investors, who might be less willing to invest in your next project;--Neighborhood organizations and local residents, who might view investors as bad neighbors and support local ordinances and zoning restrictions to make it difficult for them to buy;--National consumer groups concerned about affordable housing and minorithy home owners already see investors as a threat and may push for cnanges in banking regulations and housing policies that will limit residential real estate investment; and --Politiclains and policymakers can enact policies like the recent anti-flipping rule and other regulations at the federal and state levels.Need more evidence?

Check out the websites you can click on just from users on this thread for evidence of that.2) We did not make this change to punish people. 

When a complaint is filed against an unlicensed contractor, CSLB will verify that the accused individual or firm contracted without a contractor license and will, with sufficient evidence, determine the amount of financial injury involved.