I tried it on both of mine (rental is owned free and clear even) and primary has about $80k in equity and still got denied.

I do not think he will move if I deny his request.  

The apartments keep denying the request saying they repair tenant caused damages. 

But I can't deny how vastly beneficiary and informative their website is.

I'm afraid to ask the agent for more information on the previous title history and any endorsements given because she might smell weakness and advise the seller that complications lie ahead...that they should abandon us and seek a cash only buyer.But mostly, I'm afraid that I could pay for a loan application, an inspection, a loan commitment, and a title search and policy, and then be denied clear title and lose the ability to finance, and of course, lose the deal.It's hard to imagine that, as frequently as this supposedly occurs with very old properties, that none of them would be allowed to be financed conventionally.Does anyone have any words of encouragement that will save me some sleep tonight? 

I think worse case scenario is they would flat out deny your offer, assuming an all cash offer was coming from an investor.

Most insurance companies are well equipped to delay or deny claims.  

The answer is very clear and researching past cases will show the courts always deny charging tenants for a landlords time.

However, something that seems to have happened over a period of time longer than normally 2 weeks they will deny it.There is an exception, If a tree falls on a rotted section of your house they will cover it.

Make it a level playing field and stop denying the local areas of much needed tax revenues.