data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29cf0/29cf0e675b61838c2c81b61ccac80c9484dd078a" alt=""
26 September 2014 | 3 replies
It is a strange situation which I will ask advice in the starting out section.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45897/45897e1ae6a52baabca7e9b5ebf10c7715c8d866" alt=""
26 September 2014 | 2 replies
Does anyone have feedback about doing to section 8/government housing renting?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ec12/9ec12191da52b5eb9456f9848793ec9cacf55c45" alt=""
12 June 2015 | 11 replies
Moderate section 8 tenants spread around, but not crime ridden, many SFHs, etc.Currently Fully occupied4 2-bdrm+1bath / 1 3-bdrm+1bathRents: $840, $800, $800, $750, $1070 (3bdrm and sole section 8 resident) = $4,260/mo., $51,120 annual$4,110 Vacancy factor (8%) [about avg for this area]$250 Laundry Income$47,260 Net Rent Income$11,776 RE taxes$4,726 Prop mgmt.$2,563 Insurance$3,016 Water/Gas/Electric$1,968 Trash$500 Snow and Lawn$2,400 Maintenance and repairs$26,951 Total Expenses$20,309 NOII offered $201,000 on the property and the seller has indicated $220,000 as his lowest acceptable price.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e5d/a4e5d2d708b6d46358663322cdf56ab10781d9af" alt=""
27 September 2014 | 8 replies
Public assistant applicants (section 8).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cce1/0cce1832961844338f0abae9af13ac2092fc9528" alt=""
27 September 2014 | 12 replies
It's better to check first.This article has a list of breeds that many insurance companies do not allow (Doberman Pinschers are one of them):http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/canine-corner/201405/14-dog-breeds-blacklisted-insurance-companies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f847f/f847f5dd6a8111bb0b72c9d6d4a47daf3c2ad530" alt=""
28 September 2014 | 9 replies
But...Recent rulings and interpretations by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have shifted the original exclusion of non-owner occupied property...Consumer Credit Transaction Secured by a Dwelling Existing § 1026.36 applies the section's coverage to “a consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84439/84439d95281486990d956afa142916e260c82b4e" alt=""
28 September 2014 | 7 replies
I am also all too familiar with what paintable caulk tastes like these days since I don't thoroughly clean my fingers between each section.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72925/72925578dcbdb14eadf2d45fea78c0d471761cc0" alt=""
27 September 2014 | 12 replies
Worse case, if you decide to pay for it and skip all the drama, make sure you only pay for the section separating the two properties instead of the whole fence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd373/fd3734c778f8c6d4234f85f6fa88ad6125b82ce7" alt=""
24 May 2018 | 13 replies
I ended up re-typing about 3 pages worth of legal language from my TAR lease, within an "Additional Provisions" section.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17736/177361d3fa58687578c4b50459324745403f6a39" alt=""
11 February 2015 | 24 replies
And yes those in the business target those homes once a retro fit has been done your good for a period of time. but it needs to be a full flown retro fit not just jacking a corner up to make the house presentable to sell to the next person.