You can then fight the 1st mortgage holder.

I would contact them to see if you can get it, but I would not try to fight them in court.

Although it's the tenant's home, it's *your* property, and you have the legal right of entry....however, I've learned it's not worth fighting with a tenant if they're leaving in a relatively short time frame.

This is a specific type of exemption filing for Regulation D 505 and 506, where since the investors are considered "Accredited" meaning they are viewed to be capable of interpreting the investment on its own merit, that somehow they are in the clear.

They can fight amongst themselves over it.Once up, I just re-write a new lease for the remaining tenant.

If they choose to fight you on whether or not they need to do it/finance it and you don't actually have in the lease that they are expected to take care of such things, you're going to be eating the bill.That being said, I would never consider letting my tenant's doing anything greater then minimum repairs.

As a cellular minority (android), I MUST protest :) No, seriously Joshua Dorkin instead of fighting the android development drama, maybe consider using a Linux developer to put BP on ubuntu OS.

How do I go about it, what are the "golden tickets" for fighting this in court?

The good news is that every time you get that "wow I have no clue what any of these words mean, and there is 10,000,000 of them on this page" feeling and fight you your way through it, you're becoming smarter and one step closer to being a master investor:)I think probably the best step to take is to network with other, local investors in person.

(for the question assume Mayor Barret's attempts to fight the state law fail).