Are you weighting any comps based on sold date or anything?

Follow your heart, try to un-weight financial considerations from the decision.  

If you would like to learn a bit more about this there is a good primer here:MIRRThe biggest thing MIRR solves is assuming the interim cash flows are reinvested at the firm's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) instead of the project-level return.

I'd recommend making a gradual transition - keep chasing rentals to keep the wolf from the door, until you have a safety margin built up. 

I’m not looking for a get rich quick vehicle, Im looking for a vehicle that I can gradually build on. 

That inventory stocks are gradually getting depleted and needs to be restocked, spells more activity for the manufacturing sector.

I'll gain weight???

Thus, for all 'negative terms' there must be 'positive terms' that outweigh the negative.Buyers, and sometimes sellers, often fail to recognize this point to their own detriment.Terms to consider:Property ‘as-is’ or with inspections and associated repair allowances-Termite and pest inspection-Radon inspection-General conditions and repairsPeriod of time until closeMortgage contingency or cashInsurance contingencyWho pays closing costs-Deed preparation-Recording Fees-Realtor and/or attorney fees-Title insurance-Taxes (current and past)-Liens and utility bills outstandingEarnest MoneyContract Price(there may be a few I am neglecting as I did this from the top of my head)Therefore, if ‘contract price’ is low, which is assumed to be the case in this thread, it holds negative weight.

Whatever weight that holds... haha

The point being is that this is an example of banks throwing their weight around for additional protection and reducing risks that they have jistorically accepted in disposing of other collateral, they don't like they fact that so much money is being made from their lack of oversight, management and adminstration, they will accept profits from actual work and improvements being done, but not simply from them being inept.