I have learned a lot from books, even if it was simply approaching a problem from a new perspective. 

Despite whether or not you stay or leave the current PM I would consider "re-marketing" the property so it looks fresh on renters searches. 

I know many end buyers (like myself) would actually PREFER to take possession of the property vacant so they can start fresh with their own tenant that THEY selected. 

Hopefully gain a different perspective, be a little uncomfortable and grow.

There are many benefits to using a broker vs going direct, but just from a rate and term perspective, still maintaining your banking relationship allows you to tangibly see whether the broker can save you money and get you better terms.For example, unless you’re talking about a complex ground-up construction deal, with many moving parts, that will take significant time and manpower to execute, a good broker, confident in their abilities, will usually work with their clients and allow them to work with their existing relationships while the broker pursues and reaches out to their own lenders.

For those of you who've had similar options, what kind of difference do you look for from mathematical perspective in order to decide whether to sell or rent?

I am in the same boat although I do not have kids lol so maybe not coming from the same perspective.

From a rental perspective, I feel that overhead lights would be a convenience and not a necessity.

Tenants don't usually think about an issue from the perspective of something damaging the house as much as whether or not it inconveniences them in some way, so I need to make sure I'm asking the right questions so my priorities are protected as well.              

People are working smarter with their money, rather than harder.My perspective... your mileage may vary.David J Dachtera