data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23491/23491605215766e7b932e91fd72e005b26a9b37d" alt=""
7 May 2020 | 16 replies
But his butt in jail.The lean holder has first rights to the properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0311f/0311f2ed23620f28b758db832d689f899e4f6085" alt=""
29 December 2008 | 4 replies
The broker is going to require BOTH the owner and the option holder to sign the agreements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a60c3/a60c3b58304c6aea0f137edad8065acdb426e835" alt=""
25 September 2012 | 0 replies
This is really for all you buy and holders...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a911/6a91100a70dbba5e7025900e61ff05d1c8f8bb02" alt=""
22 June 2018 | 7 replies
Typically, a preferred investor (after all debt has been repaid) receives the agreed upon “preferred return” on their capital invested and then the remaining distributions go to the common equity holders (ie owner and any non-preferred investors).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ec78/5ec7843eb7d43e211f717e4df4aa7e7af8780e1a" alt=""
24 July 2021 | 0 replies
What Ive learned is that this type of buying and investing is for the well off and the W-2 job holder, 33 years of being self employed is not looked upon as strong work history I guess.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49621/49621a7a79668a871223ac2813363f9513cd5f35" alt=""
26 January 2010 | 3 replies
This is common with private note holders, there is "lender remorse" about three months after closing, they realize, or think, they could have had cash to play with and they forget about the tax benefits!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7a07/a7a07dae48f964209febc84bcc22eb38315de2e8" alt=""
17 January 2011 | 5 replies
Seller is mortgage holder who took back the property from rehabbers after they a rehab flip failed (apparently due to price decline) and then they failed to manage the tenants.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/223ca/223ca8dc89e8816b69b8c6738bfb486c7a75a701" alt=""
17 February 2011 | 13 replies
That is why equity holders are generally wiped out in corporate bankruptcies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fc34/4fc34f685d55c42ec749d9290dd5524adcaa5cc0" alt=""
4 October 2007 | 2 replies
If they accepted a DIL they would own it subject to the 2nd whereas if they foreclose the second will be wiped off title.The reference to "pool insurance" may in fact be a mortgage insurance policy insuring the second mortgage holder.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5ca0/f5ca01676cf63c11d04d99f2cb4b23aba21de2ff" alt=""
14 October 2022 | 9 replies
AND the second part of this is in a double closing from what I understand I'd have to have the money to purchase the home first then turn right around and get the the buyer of the wholesale to basically buy it from me - is this correct does this make me the "holder" of the title for even just a few minutes.