But it is running low...Keeping my head up is really difficult right now.. but it is either this or working for the man.

A company based out of Nevada has reached out to me and is stating that I should use their incorporating services. 

If I could go to any below-market-rent building in Oakland w/ just-cause protections and end the leases with the tenants because they are not market rate (sec 8 or not), I would be a rich rich man by now.You actually have it better than most out there, because without Section 8, you would still be sitting at lesser rents than your $1200 AND still not have the ability to end a lease!

Our gut instinct is to put the tenant relocation upon the seller as part of a purchase and sale agreement in a manner that is allowed under both Federal and local regulations and incorporate that time period into our development activities--i.e. budget and development planning and preliminary approval of financing by our portfolio lender--we would probably hold off on architectural and permit work until seller and tenant have come to an agreement for tenants re-location and hopefully close on the property after the tenant has actually vacated the unit.

I tried to do that with a finance background and man did I learn a lot about a world I did not know (construction!).

There are several advantages I have seen to incorporating their for asset protection.Any thoughts?

Currently I'm researching what else I can do to put to get this man off the streets.

Now the popcorn ceilings look dirty, where before, they didn't.On the glass, one man said to find out what company made the windows and buy just replacement glass, NOT new windows.

Man I'm glad I read this forum!

We have a lady write the letter and address it to a man at the intended house, if one lives there.