It doesn't take too long for me to heed advice and the one consistent thing I'm hearing is to get my real estate license.

Equity Harvesting (slow but nice in the right circumstances)Cashflow (while renting) - 2x costs.Financial leverage - More Cashflow and multiplying Equity dispersion across assets that produce a higher return then the alternative. 

sl=BOSTN113019001#.UwQZn0tS-PU.facebookThe Property consists of 125.25 fee acres, more or less, a 0.21 acre water line easement, and a 0.04 acre railroad spur line easement.

This is because I really like the idea of slow and steady wins the race and, I realize that I need to go a little bit slower in order to become steadier and to maintain my consistency long term. 

You talk about the necessity of tenant consistency without acknowledging your own.  

Here is my question, I have 3 rentals one is running in the red consistently.

The most common way to account for the non-habitability (which lack of running water would certainly qualify) of a rental unit is to take the monthly rent amount and divide it by the number of days in the month and then multiply that by the number of days that the property wasn't habitable. 

Just make sure when you're doing your estimate on a property, that you multiply the mill rate by the property's assessed value (i.e. not the asking price on zillow or some site like that).

Second, they are standardized (I know, not always a good thing), but because they're standardized they're (generally) consistent throughout that state/jurisdiction and easily recognized, understood and interpreted if and when you ever have to go to court and enforce/defend it.  

I do have areas I have been consistently looking at, but since they are hours out of the city and it can be difficult to learn them well.