Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (10,000+)
William M. Berkeley/Chicago IL newbie
19 May 2014 | 11 replies
My dad lives on Rose Court in Berkeley and i'm in Broadview.
Conor Lehane The Best type of Retirement Plan for a New Investor
20 May 2014 | 7 replies
If you're a total do-it-yourself kind of guy, a self-trusteed 401k does allow you to perform all administrative functions related to the plan and it's investments.What if you hate bookkeeping?
Summer Segeleon How to word this in my contract....?
21 May 2014 | 9 replies
In my state property owned with a title does not vest in another until the title is changed or a court orders it.
Mike Fiorese Seller signed agreement to fix a drain issue over a year ago
23 May 2014 | 8 replies
Should I take her to small claims court?
Rick L. Purchased Property via Tax Sale - Now What?
21 May 2014 | 6 replies
However, I have to wait for a confrontational court hearing (take about 1 month) to officially take ownership of the property.
Chris Gawlik Probate Executors ??
21 May 2014 | 2 replies
I was reading that an executor with full power (not sure it that's the correct title or term) can accept an offer for real property with out running the offer through the court system.
Derek Mitchell Deal Review in ABQ
23 May 2014 | 3 replies
Also know as an acceleration clause.A little history lesson…In the old days when banks loaned money and took back a 30-year mortgage that's exactly what you got.It didn’t matter if you sold the property to someone else that loan stuck with the property for 30 years and could be taken over and paid by anyone.Well, in the early 70's banks, lenders, state governments and other interested parties were so upset that they were getting stuck with low interest rates, missing out on taxes, assumption and other sale fees, that lenders started adding due on sale acceleration clause to their contracts.As you can imagine, a lot of borrowers thought this was unfair and brought suit against banks and lenders.Unfortunately around 1979 the United States Supreme Court found in favor of the banks, and today the due on sale -acceleration clause (usually paragraph 17) is found in most if not all conventional mortgages.For years now buyers and sellers have been trying various ways to get around the problem.
Shane Martin New to wholesaling, need some help.
29 May 2014 | 3 replies
Using the search function and reading.2.
Drew Poniewaz getting paid and avoiding taxes
29 May 2014 | 13 replies
If you want to have a general idea (not something you can go to the bank or court with, but a general idea) of whether what you are doing is OK or not, do this: Consider the intent of the rule.Simplifying a bit, I would say the intent of Section 1031 is to treat the multiple, sequentially held properties as one "investment."
Leslie Beachwood Colorado Foreclosure laws question
27 May 2014 | 5 replies
I was not swift enough to ask him whether non-judicial foreclosures, those not taking place in court, had any similar Colorado-specific twists in them, but will probably call him again.