So unless either the property has increased in appraisal value, or its income has significantly increased, you have the same dilemma that every refi-wannabe faces. 

:http://www.kts-law.com/documents/Articles/DaycareA...Thanks @John Dsousa That is a specific case summary / finding, but it lead directly to:EXCERPTS FROM THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION1596.70-1596.798 1597.40.

I kind of have the same  'dilemma' lol.  

But somethings just not right here so if anyone in AR land can cast some light on this dilemma I'd be eternally grateful.SHAME ON HIM!

Naturally this is better than being out on the street.RED TAG: Here the homeowner is DEAD in the water when they are given the news that their home is condemned by the health and safety and building departments and they are not allowed to re-occupy it and often not even allowed back in to gather personal belongings and keepsakes.

I am a health care professional in Nigeria, with a long term passion for real estate development.As at now I have no formal education yet or capital to start a property development company, so I'm trying to start small with a blog that can generate some income over timeIdeas would be most appreciated

That rationale is that as long as the tenant is OK with living with a degraded unit, so long as it's not integral to the health, safety, or welfare of the occupants, building, or other tenants, what's the difference? 

You had no choice to fix it - not only to protect the property but to ensure the health and safety of both tenants. 

The lady is having health problems and really needs to sell the house which has been listed with a realtor for almost a year.

Before purchasing my house hack I cut my expenses and rented a room from a friend for a little over a year to build up a health savings.