Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (10,000+)
N/A N/A rent to own popularity
3 November 2007 | 16 replies
You do have more risk involved versus finding a motivated homeowner and sandwich lease it.
N/A N/A mike collins
23 October 2007 | 5 replies
Is anyone here involved?
N/A N/A Another one from Nor Cal
3 October 2007 | 5 replies
Hello All,I've been involved in creative RE investing for about 3-4 years now.
K B Newbie from Orange County, CA, and a bit about me
6 October 2007 | 7 replies
My names Kelsey, I'm 22 years old and have had an interest in this industry ever since my parents got involved in investment properties.
Nick Albin How to be an appraiser?
1 October 2007 | 0 replies
What is involved if you want to be an appraiser?
Adam Anderson Mobile home tax question
1 December 2007 | 5 replies
These prices indicate there is no land involved, so the mobile homes are personal property.
N/A N/A First time buyer - San Diego
2 October 2007 | 4 replies
The banks have no emotional involvement with the property.The downside is they can be in poor condition.
Willis Seng Need Help, Commercial Property Analysis
11 October 2007 | 7 replies
Personally I would not get involved in such a deal without a NNN lease because it ensures the tenants will not only take care of the building and produce much less wear and tear, but they will be responsible for much of the day to day - the whole reason for getting into an office deal in my opinion.
Vicky Blacknall Small Mobile Home Park
16 December 2007 | 4 replies
There are two pieces of property involved in this deal.
Curt Dumonceaux Question about judgements
3 October 2007 | 1 reply
Does the homeowner have to have the lien removed or is there a way that we can go about doing this without involving the homeowner?