In no way am I advocating ignoring a leak but simply pointing out that having one doesn't equal the building blowing up.

What am I missing?

Am I correct in think this could save some rehab cost?

A few days later the seller goes back to the original attorney and say there will be no credit towards the repairs because it is an as-is contract , but on the contract the seller checks off they have no knowledge of any city or Government violations, and "MY" attorney seems to be just fine with not providing a credit, the "MY" R.E estate also say this is an as-is sale with a rehab loan .So what am I suppose to do when everybody sides with the seller.

Does my logic make sense here or am I walking into a bad move?

Or am I missing something.  

I can probably replicate all this with a My Lowes card and save more using a Discover card (the next 2 months) or stacking a rewards card with coupons.

Am I wrong about this?

Some are entirely vacant, others not.Located in and around University Circle, close to the Cleveland Clinic, one would think that people working at CC would like to live close by, have a better than average income, thereby affording and paying higher rents.CC, by virtue of its global brand recognition and continued success in the medical field, would only attract more growth, staff and therefore -- housing demand.What am I missing here?

Am I looking at this from the wrong angle in some way?